<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You&#8217;re going to keep Buick?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sevensons.org/2009/02/18/youre-going-to-keep-buick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sevensons.org/2009/02/18/youre-going-to-keep-buick/</link>
	<description>a pack of temperamental bastards</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 19:02:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Three Barrels</title>
		<link>http://sevensons.org/2009/02/18/youre-going-to-keep-buick/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Three Barrels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sevensons.org/?p=107#comment-25</guid>
		<description>GM won&#039;t kill Buick because it is the most popular foreign nameplate in China and they obviously think that is a big chunk of their future--you know, a simple typo in that last line would have created a horrible epithet, but I digress.  

So Buick will hang around because the Chinese like them, in much the same way that hair metal bands hang around because of Canadians.  We as a nation may have long since outgrown these things, the rest of the world not so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM won&#8217;t kill Buick because it is the most popular foreign nameplate in China and they obviously think that is a big chunk of their future&#8211;you know, a simple typo in that last line would have created a horrible epithet, but I digress.  </p>
<p>So Buick will hang around because the Chinese like them, in much the same way that hair metal bands hang around because of Canadians.  We as a nation may have long since outgrown these things, the rest of the world not so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Croker</title>
		<link>http://sevensons.org/2009/02/18/youre-going-to-keep-buick/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Croker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sevensons.org/?p=107#comment-24</guid>
		<description>And for the record, if we&#039;re keeping one, I agree that GM needs just those two brands: Chevrolet and Cadillac.

In this day and age, that appears to be most sustainable number of brands and hits both ends of the spectrum.

I think GM &lt;b&gt;needs&lt;/b&gt; to be worried about the Chinese and Indian manufacturers. The same way they should have been worried about Hyundai ten years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And for the record, if we&#8217;re keeping one, I agree that GM needs just those two brands: Chevrolet and Cadillac.</p>
<p>In this day and age, that appears to be most sustainable number of brands and hits both ends of the spectrum.</p>
<p>I think GM <b>needs</b> to be worried about the Chinese and Indian manufacturers. The same way they should have been worried about Hyundai ten years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Three Barrels</title>
		<link>http://sevensons.org/2009/02/18/youre-going-to-keep-buick/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Three Barrels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sevensons.org/?p=107#comment-23</guid>
		<description>The one that makes no sense to me is GMC.  All it sells are Chevy trucks under a different badge.  WTF?

GM should be Chevy and Cadillac, end of list.  As for Saturn dealers organizing a buyout, GM mentioned that in their press release announcing the Saturn phase-out, then immediately countered that news with a whole bunch of reasons why that would be a bad idea.  I guess they are worried about Chinese or Indian competition here in the States and not so much about the URGENT need for cash RIGHT NOW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one that makes no sense to me is GMC.  All it sells are Chevy trucks under a different badge.  WTF?</p>
<p>GM should be Chevy and Cadillac, end of list.  As for Saturn dealers organizing a buyout, GM mentioned that in their press release announcing the Saturn phase-out, then immediately countered that news with a whole bunch of reasons why that would be a bad idea.  I guess they are worried about Chinese or Indian competition here in the States and not so much about the URGENT need for cash RIGHT NOW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Croker</title>
		<link>http://sevensons.org/2009/02/18/youre-going-to-keep-buick/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Croker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sevensons.org/?p=107#comment-21</guid>
		<description>They assumed they&#039;d rely on Benz designers? Guess that didn&#039;t work out.

Here&#039;s a slice of irony: Apparently Saturn dealers are looking to buy themselves out. They are looking into options for bringing in Chinese or Indian cars to keep the brand alive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They assumed they&#8217;d rely on Benz designers? Guess that didn&#8217;t work out.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a slice of irony: Apparently Saturn dealers are looking to buy themselves out. They are looking into options for bringing in Chinese or Indian cars to keep the brand alive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue Crab</title>
		<link>http://sevensons.org/2009/02/18/youre-going-to-keep-buick/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Crab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sevensons.org/?p=107#comment-20</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m continually mystified by GM&#039;s inability to shed brands.  Toyota has three, and just added that third one.  GM needs Chevy and Cadillac to survive and nothing else.  I think that&#039;s a doable business model, but Lordy it&#039;s like pulling teeth.

Chrysler is absolutely dead man walking.  I hadn&#039;t realized how much Daimler had gotten rid of all of the design talent.  They literally have no ability to design a new car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m continually mystified by GM&#8217;s inability to shed brands.  Toyota has three, and just added that third one.  GM needs Chevy and Cadillac to survive and nothing else.  I think that&#8217;s a doable business model, but Lordy it&#8217;s like pulling teeth.</p>
<p>Chrysler is absolutely dead man walking.  I hadn&#8217;t realized how much Daimler had gotten rid of all of the design talent.  They literally have no ability to design a new car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

