<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s more effective to cut the whole thing off</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sevensons.org/2009/03/26/its-more-effective-to-cut-the-whole-thing-off/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sevensons.org/2009/03/26/its-more-effective-to-cut-the-whole-thing-off/</link>
	<description>a pack of temperamental bastards</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 19:02:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Edison MacGyver</title>
		<link>http://sevensons.org/2009/03/26/its-more-effective-to-cut-the-whole-thing-off/comment-page-1/#comment-849</link>
		<dc:creator>Edison MacGyver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sevensons.org/?p=241#comment-849</guid>
		<description>That was kinda my point... If circumcision on an adult is painful, why do it on a baby? I guarantee it hurts the baby - they just can&#039;t complain about it or develop a long term memory of it. It seems the  *only* health benefit of circumcision is for men who choose to be sexually active with multiple partners and without protection. There is no other valid reason for cicumcising baby boys. So is a parent who elects the surgery for their son assuming a future of loose morals and wayward ways?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was kinda my point&#8230; If circumcision on an adult is painful, why do it on a baby? I guarantee it hurts the baby &#8211; they just can&#8217;t complain about it or develop a long term memory of it. It seems the  *only* health benefit of circumcision is for men who choose to be sexually active with multiple partners and without protection. There is no other valid reason for cicumcising baby boys. So is a parent who elects the surgery for their son assuming a future of loose morals and wayward ways?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrs. Blue Crab</title>
		<link>http://sevensons.org/2009/03/26/its-more-effective-to-cut-the-whole-thing-off/comment-page-1/#comment-836</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrs. Blue Crab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 00:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sevensons.org/?p=241#comment-836</guid>
		<description>This is a safe decision for parents to make on their children&#039;s behalf. Circumcision on an adult is more painful &amp; costly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a safe decision for parents to make on their children&#8217;s behalf. Circumcision on an adult is more painful &amp; costly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

